Summary of Technos Discussion Board

October 19, 2007

The TC Technos were responsible for reading and discussing the New York Times article “The Lessons of Classroom 506” by L. Belkin. Overall the group generated reactions to three questions. First, how would you feel about working in a classroom like 506? Second, do you think this is a positive setting for Thomas’ non-disabled peers? Third, do you think that the inclusive setting would be a good fit for Sapphire?

In response to the possibility of working in a classroom similar to class 506, the Technos were very positive. The dominant thought was that the setting provided much of the expertise, technology, and social interaction that Thomas needed to progress. However, there was concern about the level of parental involvement. All members agree that parents should be a part of the educational team. Nevertheless, some hesitation was expressed about the parents playing such an integral part on a daily basis.

The second question involved the benefits of having both children with and without disabilities in the same classroom setting. There was a unanimous belief that only positive experiences could arise from such a diverse setting. The advantages mentioned included gaining open-mindedness, empathy, and the opportunity to experience different perspectives. All participants expressed a hope that their own children would attend such a classroom.

Finally, the Technos considered the pros and cons of placement for Sapphire. Sapphire is the student we observed in the last lecture. She was learning to use adaptive technology in order to improve communication, motor, and academic skills. Participants in this discussion decided that Sapphire should be included in the inclusive setting. The Technos contend that Sapphire’s social nature would flourish in an open environment. Although, they believe that the setting should be determined on an individual basis.

Reported by Stephanie Harmon